![]() ![]() The present research assesses potential correlates of discriminatory police behavior, comparing police and civilian participants in a first person shooter task (FPST) as well as on various self-report measures of intergroup contact, intergroup attitudes, and ideological beliefs in three preregistered studies. We wish to thank Michael Schultz for his invaluable care and dedication in conducting this research. ![]() Support also came from NIMH grant R01-45049 to the third and fourth authors. This material is based upon work supported under National Institute of Mental Health grant F31-MH069017 and National Science Foundation Continuing Grant 0642580. The present study manipulated Acknowledgments If threat perception really mediates shooter bias, then any salient danger cue (not just race) should evoke a tendency to shoot. We have suggested that racial bias in decisions to shoot reflects the fact that most Americans associate Blacks (or, at least, young Black men) with danger (Correll et al., 2002, Devine, 1989, Devine & Elliot, 1995). The present research tested a single, very simple proposition: perception of threat fosters a predisposition to shoot. There was a main effect of object, F(1,53) = 4.70, p < 0.035, such that participants were more likely to incorrectly shoot an unarmed target (false alarm) than to Discussion neutral first) × 2 (Context: dangerous vs. ![]() Error rates for each target type, in each game, were submitted to a 2 (Task Order: danger first vs. On average, participants responded incorrectly on 11.52% of trials and timed out on 10.46% of trials. The study involved a 2 (Task Order: Results We selected a set of 40 (20 Participants and designįifty-five non-Black undergraduates (mean age = 18.87 33 female, 21 male, 1 missing 46 White, 3 Latina/o, 2 Asian, 4 missing/other) participated in partial fulfillment of a course requirement. We did not want performance to reflect systematic differences in participants' ability to discriminate objects in the neutral vs. We conducted a preliminary study to equate the background images for visual complexity. The second differed only in that it employed threatening backgrounds. The first, identical to the task used in previous research (Correll et al., 2002), presented targets in neutral backgrounds. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |